Advertisement

Advertisement

Corpus Juris Civilis

[ kawr-puhs joor-is si-vahy-lis, si-vil-is ]

noun

  1. the collective title of the body of ancient Roman law as compiled and codified under the emperor Justinian in the 6th century a.d.: comprises the Digest, the Institutes, the Justinian Code, and the Novels.


Corpus Juris Civilis

/ sɪˈvaɪlɪs /

noun

  1. law the body of Roman or civil law consolidated by Justinian in the 6th century ad. It consists of four parts, the Institutes, Digest, Code, and Novels
“Collins English Dictionary — Complete & Unabridged” 2012 Digital Edition © William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 © HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012
Discover More

Word History and Origins

Origin of Corpus Juris Civilis1

1890–95; < New Latin: literally, body of civil law
Discover More

Word History and Origins

Origin of Corpus Juris Civilis1

New Latin, literally: body of civil law
Discover More

Example Sentences

It is here that we must stop and consider that when the English transition to statutory law finally got rolling in the mid-1500s, the extremely detailed and sophisticated Corpus Juris Civilis had been on papyrus for over a millennium.

From Forbes

When the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I commanded that great compilation or Roman Law known as the Corpus Juris Civilis, or more commonly the Civil Code, the accompanying commentary known as the Institutes of Justinian gave a very detailed treatment of fraudulent transfer law which in substance is little changed from when those Institutes were published in the year 533 A.D.

From Forbes

The great Corpus Juris Civilis, that comprehensive restatement of Roman law which was mandated by the Emperor Justinian I, carefully abstracted by a team assembled by Tribonion from over 2,000 books written by some 39 selected Roman legal scholars such as Ulpian and Gaius, and issued in various parts from 529 to 534 A.D., set forth the basic principles of corporate law.

From Forbes

There was some deep-laid plot between Murray Bradshaw and Cynthia Badlam, involving the interests of some of the persons connected with the late Malachi Withers; for that the paper described by Kitty was the same that he had seen the young man conceal in the Corpus Juris Civilis, it was impossible to doubt.

We of to-day must not regard the last three passages cited from the Corpus Juris Civilis as particularly reprehending the property of the master in his slave.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Corpus Juris Canonicicorpus luteum