Advertisement
Advertisement
copyright
[ kop-ee-rahyt ]
noun
- the exclusive right none to make copies none, license, and otherwise exploit a literary, musical, or artistic work, whether printed, audio, video, etc.: works granted such right none by law on or after January 1, 1978, are protected for the lifetime of an author or creator and for a period of 70 years after their death.
adjective
- of or relating to copyrights.
- Also copy·righted. protected by copyright.
verb (used with object)
- to secure a copyright on.
©
1symbol for
- copyright
copyright
2/ ˈkɒpɪˌraɪt /
noun
- the exclusive right to produce copies and to control an original literary, musical, or artistic work, granted by law for a specified number of years (in Britain, usually 70 years from the death of the author, composer, etc, or from the date of publication if later) (c)
adjective
- (of a work, etc) subject to or controlled by copyright
verb
- tr to take out a copyright on
copyright
1- A grant of an exclusive right to produce or sell a book, motion picture, work of art, musical composition, software , or similar product during a specified period of time.
copyright
2- The legal protection given to published works, forbidding anyone but the author from publishing or selling them. An author can transfer the copyright to another person or corporation, such as a publishing company.
Derived Forms
- ˈcopyˌrighter, noun
- ˈcopyˌrightable, adjective
Other Words From
- copy·righta·ble adjective
- copy·righter noun
- un·copy·righted adjective
Word History and Origins
Origin of copyright1
Example Sentences
The snap judgment among legal experts was that a federal judge’s dismissal on Nov. 7 of a copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI, the leader in advanced chatbots, will short-circuit an ever-growing effort by artists and writers to keep AI firms from stealing their content.
McMahon’s ruling, based on a Supreme Court decision in an unrelated case, “could leave AI copyright claims on shaky ground,” wrote Los Angeles intellectual property lawyer Aaron Moss on his website.
The judge not only dismissed Raw Story’s case; she implied that no copyright holder might be able to show enough harm from AI scraping to win an infringement case.
That’s because the case brings together two muddy legal regimes: copyright law, which is renowned for its craziness and confusion; and AI law, which may be years away from coalescing into coherence.
At least 12 lawsuits against AI developers alleging copyright violations are currently wending their way through the federal courts — with plaintiffs including the publishers of Mother Jones, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times; the music recording industry; and writers Michael Chabon and Sarah Silverman.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Browse